Edge AI Potential: Why Security Must Come First

Reading Time: 14 minutes

Edge AI is being hailed as the next big leap in technology – bringing intelligence closer to where data is generated, cutting down latency, and enabling real-time decision-making. But as with any technological leap, the path forward is far from clear-cut. Among developers, security architects, and decision-makers in large enterprises, there is an ongoing debate about how best to secure these distributed, decentralized systems. Should security be embedded deeply within the hardware? Or should it rely on sophisticated, ever-evolving software solutions? Some argue that the solution lies in robust encryption protocols, while others believe that physical security and network segmentation should take precedence.

Why We Decided To Write About It

Consider this: There are some people who have only heard of Edge AI but essentially have only a general understanding. There are also decision-makers who are still weighing the pros and cons of adopting this tech but are concerned about how it might impact the security of their entire infrastructure. And there are security experts, whose school of thought insists that, for example, federated learning – where data stays on the device, and only model updates are shared – can be the ultimate answer to privacy concerns. And skeptics, who point out that this approach itself opens up new avenues for adversarial attacks. Then there’s the controversy surrounding security frameworks that combine networking and security into a single cloud-based service. While some see them as the future of secure networking, others argue that it introduces its own set of vulnerabilities by centralizing security controls. And such discussions and opinions are simply endless literally on every aspect.

With so many conflicting opinions, how can organizations confidently move forward in deploying such technology?

Here, we will simply try to lay out all aspects of the issue and merely give our opinion on most of the points of contention, without aiming to end the controversy. Just to give you a clearer picture of the path ahead and the considerations necessary to protect Edge AI as it integrates more deeply into our daily lives and industries. And let’s start with some quick basics. 

What is Edge AI?

In simple terms, it’s running AI algorithms directly on devices like sensors, cameras, smartphones, or IoT gadgets – where the data is actually created. Unlike traditional AI, which sends data to remote cloud servers for processing, it keeps data processing local, right on the device or nearby servers. This approach cuts down the time it takes to process information and makes it possible to react instantly, which is important in situations where even a small delay can cause problems.

Why does this matter? In many cases, like self-driving cars or industrial machinery, there’s no time to wait for data to be sent back to the cloud. Decisions need to be made immediately, and Edge AI allows that to happen. Keeping data processing local also reduces the amount of data that needs to be sent over the internet, which can help protect privacy and lower the risk of data being intercepted.

The main difference between Edge AI and cloud-based AI is where the data gets processed. Cloud-based AI relies on powerful servers located far away, which can handle huge amounts of data but might take longer to send results back. This delay is a problem in applications where quick decisions are necessary. Edge AI processes data right at the edge of the network, closer to where the data is created. This speeds up the process and keeps more sensitive data out of the cloud, which can be a big advantage in terms of privacy. Another often overlooked benefit is that Edge AI can keep systems running even if the connection to the cloud is lost – something that could be decisive in industries where downtime isn’t an option.

This doesn’t mean Edge AI is automatically better in all cases. There’s a trade-off between the raw computational power of the cloud and the speed and resilience of the edge. Each approach has its place, but the growing reliance on Edge AI shows that more and more businesses are prioritizing edge computing over raw processing power.

The Security Landscape

As Edge AI spreads, so do the challenges in securing it. By decentralizing data processing and storage, this tech exposes devices to a range of risks that are often different – and in some ways more severe – than those faced by centralized cloud systems. These devices are often in the open, which makes them more vulnerable to physical and cyber threats. Let’s break down the main ones.

Here are the main issues:

• Physical Access Risks: Edge devices are often deployed in places where physical security is minimal – a remote industrial site or even a busy city street. Unlike a cloud data center, where access is tightly controlled, these devices can be tampered with, stolen, or damaged. A breached device can lead to far worse problems – data leaks, sabotage, or even opening up entire networks to attack. We can’t pretend this is a rare scenario; the more we push intelligence to the edge, the more these threats grow.
• Data Privacy Concerns: Edge AI often deals with highly sensitive data – personal health info from wearable devices, real-time location data from autonomous vehicles, etc. Processing this data locally is supposed to boost privacy, but that only holds true if the systems securing that data are rock-solid. And that’s where the dilemma arises: connecting these edge devices to broader networks means exposing this data to potential breaches. The convenience and power of Edge AI come with a cost – one that we can’t afford to underestimate.
• Cybersecurity Threats: These devices are prime targets for cyberattacks, and the list of threats keeps growing: malware, ransomware, DDoS attacks, and edge devices are vulnerable to them. What makes this worse is that many edge systems don’t have the same strong security layers as centralized systems, making them easier to infiltrate. An attack on an edge device can also have cascading effects throughout the entire network. And that’s not hypothetical – it’s already happening.

According to the Thales Data Threat Report, Zscaler ThreatLabz AI Security Report, and Eviden Cybersecurity Threats Report.

Key Strategies for Enhancing Edge AI Security

Securing Edge AI is far more complex than just slapping on a firewall or encrypting data. It requires a holistic approach that includes smart network design, encryption, secure authentication, and regular updates. And one of the frameworks that has gained popularity is Secure Access Service Edge (SASE). To be clear, picking out one of the providers of such a service is an option, but it’s not the whole solution.

SASE Role in Protecting Edge AI Environments

SASE is being hailed as a revolutionary approach, combining wide-area networking (WAN) with security services like secure web gateways, firewalls-as-a-service, and Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) into a single cloud-delivered model. But what exactly is SASE?

Simply put, SASE (Secure Access Service Edge) is a way to combine networking and security into one cloud-based service. It was developed to address the challenges of modern IT environments, where traditional, centralized security models no longer work well. As more people work remotely and use cloud-based applications, SASE helps by providing a consistent and unified approach to security, no matter where users or devices are located.

 

For Edge AI, SASE is seen as a solution because it provides consistent security policies across devices and locations, which is truly helpful when your devices are spread out and not easily controlled. By standardizing security in this way, SASE makes it easier to manage and protect diverse, decentralized networks, ensuring that all parts of the system are secure, no matter where they are.

How It Works:

• Unified Security Policies: One of the biggest challenges with Edge AI is that it’s often spread across various environments – some secure, some not so much. SASE allows organizations to apply the same security rules across all edge devices, no matter where they are. The experts argue that standardization can lead to rigidity, making systems less adaptable to specific local risks. For example, an edge device operating in a high-risk environment might require more stringent security measures than a device in a controlled, secure location. By enforcing a one-size-fits-all policy, organizations might overlook these details, potentially leaving some environments either under-secured or overburdened with unnecessary security protocols. 

  However, We believe that in certain cases, such as in industries with high regulatory requirements like finance or healthcare, the benefits of a unified security framework significantly outweigh the potential risks. These sectors often deal with highly sensitive data where consistency and standardization are necessary for compliance and protection. It’s true that some environments may require additional security measures, but these can be layered on top of the baseline policies provided by a unified framework.

• Dynamic Threat Protection: Edge AI systems are constantly exposed to new threats, from targeted attacks to broad-based malware. SASE integrates real-time threat intelligence and automated responses, allowing the system to detect and counteract threats as they happen. Some security professionals believe that relying on automated systems can lead to overconfidence and missed threats when the system fails to recognize something unusual. They point out that automated systems, while powerful, are not infallible. These systems rely on algorithms that can sometimes fail to recognize novel or sophisticated threats, particularly those designed to bypass common detection methods. When security teams become too confident in these automated tools, they may miss subtle indicators of an attack that a human analyst could catch. This concern is amplified in situations where a system might be compromised in a way that makes the automated tools less effective or entirely blind to certain types of threats. 

  But, while the concerns about over-reliance on automation are valid, the alternative – manual monitoring – is, as we see it, simply impractical at scale, especially in dynamic environments like Edge AI.

• Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA): The concept of Zero Trust is simple: trust no one, verify everything. ZTNA enforces strict identity checks for anyone or anything trying to access the network. Сritics of ZTNA point out that this level of scrutiny can be cumbersome. For instance, legitimate users might experience delays in accessing the resources they need, which can impact productivity. 

  However, the risk of unauthorized access is too high to ignore. In security, convenience should never trump safety. ZTNA might add contention, but it’s a necessary inconvenience.

• Secure Data Transmission: Data is constantly moving between edge devices and central systems, and keeping this transmission secure is non-negotiable. There are ongoing debates among experts about the best way to secure this data. Some experts in this camp suggest that lighter encryption or even selective encryption (where only critical data is encrypted) might be a better compromise to maintain system performance. Advocates say that compromising on encryption is far too risky. Recent data breaches in industries ranging from finance to healthcare have shown the catastrophic impact of unsecured transmissions. They also velieve that advances in encryption technology, such as hardware-accelerated encryption or lightweight algorithms specifically designed for IoT and edge devices, are reducing performance impacts. 

  In our opinion, securing data transmission must still remain a top priority, even if it requires small sacrifices in speed or resource efficiency. And for Edge AI, where vast amounts of sensitive data are processed, this exchange is a necessary part of maintaining trust in this tech.

Protecting AI Models at the Edge

AI models deployed at the edge are both valuable and vulnerable. They’re prime targets for tampering, reverse engineering, and intellectual property theft. Protecting these models means maintaining the integrity and effectiveness of Edge AI systems. But not everyone agrees on the best way to do this.

Tamper-Resistance Mechanisms: Edge devices can use tamper-resistant hardware like secure elements or Trusted Platform Modules (TPMs) to protect against tampering. These components secure encryption keys and sensitive operations, making it hard for attackers to alter the model undetected. 

Critics say that no hardware is truly tamper-proof and determined attackers will find a way. They’re right – nothing is foolproof. There are documented cases where supposedly tamper-resistant devices have been compromised, proving that these defenses are not invincible. The concern is that relying too heavily on these mechanisms could lead to a false sense of security, where organizations believe their systems are secure when, in reality, they are still vulnerable to attacks. 

However, the goal of tamper-resistant mechanisms isn’t to provide absolute security but to make attacks significantly more difficult and costly. By adding layers of difficulty, organizations can reduce the likelihood of a successful breach and push attackers to look for easier targets. It’s about raising the bar to the point where the effort required to compromise the system outweighs the potential reward.

Federated Learning: A method that allows AI models to be trained on multiple devices without needing to gather all the data in one place. Each device works with its own data and sends only updates to a central server. This server then combines these updates to improve the overall model, while the original data stays on the device. This method is praised for keeping data private, as it doesn’t leave the device, which also lowers the risk of someone stealing important information. But not everyone agrees that it’s the best solution. The experts point out that even though the data stays on the device, the updates sent to the central server can still be targeted by attackers. For instance, if an attacker gains control of a few devices, they could send false updates to mess with the global model. It is also quite complex and requires a lot of computing power and careful coordination between devices.

In our opinion, the security concerns are valid – federated learning does come with risks, especially when it comes to updates. But the benefits it offers in protecting privacy and reducing the chance of large-scale data breaches, make it worth considering. While it’s not a perfect solution, when combined with other security practices, it still can provide a strong defense for AI systems.

Differential Privacy: A technique that adds a bit of random noise to the data used to train AI models. This noise makes it hard for anyone to figure out individual data points from the model, which helps keep personal information private. It’s especially useful when AI models are shared across different devices or users because it stops anyone from easily identifying specific data within the model. However, some experts argue that adding noise to the data can make AI models less accurate. The more noise you add, the harder it is for the model to learn effectively from the data, which could lead to mistakes in its predictions, and this trade-off between privacy and accuracy could be problematic.

We believe that the worry about losing accuracy is understandable, but when dealing with sensitive data, the need for privacy often outweighs this issue. The trade-off between keeping private and accuracy is sometimes necessary, especially when the data could have serious privacy implications if it were exposed. Especially for companies working with sensitive data.

Micro Data Centers Vs. Edge-to-Cloud Integration

Securing IoT devices within an Edge AI framework requires a multi-layered approach that addresses both physical and digital threats. However, different experts have different takes on how to best achieve this.

Micro Data Centers: Deploying micro data centers close to IoT devices is often seen as a strong strategy for enhancing security. These centers offer localized computing power and security resources, handling tasks like data encryption, secure storage, and real-time threat detection. However, some experts point out that introducing micro data centers can create new vulnerabilities and add complexity to the system. They’re not wrong – adding more components always increases potential points of failure. But the benefits, such as reducing data transmission over insecure networks and providing immediate, localized security, generally outweigh these concerns. It’s a trade-off, but in specific situations, it’s one that makes sense.

Edge-to-Cloud Integration: Integrating Edge AI with cloud systems is a strategy that brings together the best of both worlds – the speed and flexibility of edge computing with the powerful security and processing power of the cloud. There is an opinion that this integration can introduce unnecessary risks and complicate security management, pointing out that the more systems are connected, the more potential points of attack are created. We agree that adding more links to the chain can increase risk. However, the cloud provides the advanced computing capabilities and security features that edge devices often lack. Still, this integration needs careful management and planning to ensure that new vulnerabilities aren’t introduced. Thoughtful design and thorough oversight are key to making this approach both effective and secure.

In our view, companies must focus security strategies on specific needs. Micro data centers are the way to go for high-stakes environments where latency and immediate response are required. However, for sectors that require heavy data processing and long-term storage, the cloud offers indispensable benefits that outweigh the risks, provided that the integration is managed correctly.

Where Is The Bare Minimum?

We believe that the only real way to start is by adopting a security-by-design mindset. Security shouldn’t be an afterthought, and it has to be baked into the system from day one. Yet, here’s the uncomfortable truth: many Edge Computing deployments treat security like an add-on, something to be patched later. That’s a mistake because the stakes are too high.

Key principles of security-by-design for Edge AI we stand for:

• End-to-End Encryption: All data – whether it’s being transmitted or sitting idle – needs to be encrypted. This is non-negotiable. Even if an attacker gets their hands on the data, encryption guarantees that they can’t do anything with it. But encryption is only as strong as the implementation. For example, using outdated algorithms like SHA-1 or weak key lengths can give a false sense of security. Another example is poor key management. If encryption keys are stored insecurely or not rotated regularly, the whole system becomes vulnerable, no matter how strong the encryption algorithm itself might be. Additionally, failing to encrypt metadata or assuming that only critical data needs encryption can leave significant gaps. In practice, true end-to-end encryption requires a comprehensive approach that addresses all aspects of data security – from algorithm selection and key management to the protection of data at every stage of its lifecycle.
• Authentication Mechanisms: Simple passwords aren’t enough. Edge AI systems need strong, multi-layered authentication, like MFA (Multi-Factor Authentication) and biometrics. Sure, this adds friction, but that’s a small price to pay for protecting sensitive systems. Authentication should be seen as the first line of defense, not just a nuisance to work around.
• Regular Security Updates: We all know that updates are important, but keeping edge devices updated is often easier said than done. Many devices are out in the field, hard to reach, and sometimes neglected. Still, without automating consistent updates, even the best security setup can be undone by a single outdated patch.
• Secure Boot Processes: We need secure boot mechanisms to make sure that only trusted software can run on the device, preventing malicious code from executing. It’s a way to ensure the integrity of the system from the moment it powers on. It’s not flashy, but it’s absolutely necessary.

The Future

One of the most significant trends in Edge AI security is the anticipated advancement in hardware technologies. Future Edge AI devices are expected to feature faster processors, enhanced memory capabilities, and more energy-efficient designs. 

• Faster Processors: As AI models grow in complexity, the demand for processing power at the edge increases. Next-generation edge devices will be (and some already are) equipped with processors capable of handling these demands while also incorporating security features at the hardware level. For instance, hardware-based security modules can provide built-in encryption, secure key storage, and tamper resistance. However, there’s a question among experts about whether the focus on hardware security is the right approach. Some argue that software-based solutions offer greater flexibility and are easier to update as threats evolve.
• Energy-Efficient Designs: As many edge devices rely on battery power, improving energy efficiency is important for maintaining continuous operation in resource-constrained environments. Future designs will likely incorporate more efficient energy-saving technologies such as low-power processors, optimized AI model architectures, and advanced power management techniques. Yet, there’s a concern that prioritizing energy efficiency could come at the cost of weakened security features. 

The Need for Industry-Wide Standards and Collaborative Efforts

It’s important to make devices from different manufacturers work together securely. For instance, there are already efforts underway, such as the introduction of the Thread and Matter standards promoted by the Connectivity Standards Alliance, which aim to create more uniformity in how devices connect and secure themselves. However, there’s a question about how strict these standards should be. Some experts push for very detailed standards to the highest level of security. They say that without strict guidelines, we’re leaving too much room for errors and vulnerabilities. Others believe that too much rigidity could stifle innovation, making it hard for new ideas and technologies to develop. 

By sharing knowledge, best practices, and threat intelligence, organizations can develop more effective security strategies and respond more quickly to emerging threats. However, companies may be reluctant to share information that they consider proprietary or that could expose vulnerabilities. Despite these concerns, the benefits of collaboration far outweigh the risks. Establishing industry consortia, public-private partnerships, and cross-industry research initiatives will be key to safeguarding the future of this technology.

Final Thoughts

When it comes to securing Edge AI and IoT devices, there’s no solution that would fit everyones needs. Each industry and each organization faces unique challenges and risks. But one thing is clear: security must be a priority from the very beginning. The costs and complexity of securing these systems can vary widely. This depends on many factors, including the specific needs and circumstances of each case.

At Sirin Software, we understand that navigating these complexities isn’t easy. Our engineers and experts are here to help you make sense of it all. Instead of just offering solutions, we often provide tailored guidance that fits your specific situation. We focus on building secure, reliable systems that align with your goals and constraints. For instance, we enhanced a NeuroCAD tool for an AI client, focusing on visualization, management, and security. Our team also developed an AI-driven surveillance system for a retail leader, combining edge computing with cloud integration to deliver real-time threat detection. And in another project, we created an AI-powered email management extension that automates responses, maintaining data security and consistency across communications.

This article has highlighted the importance of prioritizing security in your Edge AI and IoT deployments. We’re committed to helping companies of any size or industry implement these technologies safely and effectively. If you’re looking for a partner who understands the balance between innovation and security, our team is here to support you, every step of the way.  Just reach out to us today and get a free consultation!